Nepal’s journey toward achieving transitional justice for the victims of the 1996-2006 conflict has encountered significant setbacks, primarily due to political interference in the appointment processes of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and the Commission of Investigation on Enforced Disappeared Persons (CIEDP). Established under the 2024 transitional justice law, these commissions were intended to address the atrocities committed during the conflict. However, recent developments have raised concerns about the credibility and effectiveness of these bodies.
The Appointment Controversy
In December 2024, the recommendation committee, led by former Chief Justice Om Prakash Mishra, forwarded names for the leadership of the TRC and CIEDP. Among the proposed candidates were former joint attorney general Mahesh Thapa for the TRC and former chief secretary Liladevi Gadtaula for the CIEDP. These appointments have been met with strong opposition from conflict victims and human rights organizations. Critics allege that the selection process was marred by political interference, favoring individuals based on party affiliations rather than merit or trust among victims.(Human Rights Watch)
A joint statement from 28 organizations representing insurgency-era victims condemned the shortlist, stating that it appeared to favor individuals with contentious reputations for key positions, threatening the opportunity to meaningfully resolve transitional justice issues. They called for the recommendation committee to consult with individuals excluded from the shortlist, include their names, and ensure the selection process is impartial, transparent, and competitive. (Human Rights Watch)
Elaboration:
- Transitional Justice Appointments:A group of 38 victim and survivor organizations have expressed serious concerns about the shortlisted candidates for transitional justice roles. They claim the selection process was not transparent, was influenced by political power-sharing, and favored individuals who may not be qualified or aligned with the principles of transitional justice. They specifically noted that the list includes individuals who have defended perpetrators of human rights abuses and lack the necessary knowledge or expertise in transitional justice.
- Chief Justice Appointment:The appointment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is a process involving the Constitutional Council’s recommendation followed by the President’s appointment. While the process is constitutionally mandated, there have been concerns about the selection criteria and the potential for political influence. For example, in October 2024, Prakash Man Singh Raut was appointed as the new Chief Justice following the retirement of Bishowambhar Prasad Shrestha.
- Judicial Council’s Role:The Judicial Council in Nepal is responsible for selecting, appointing, promoting, and handling other aspects of the judiciary, including judges at the Supreme Court. This process also raises questions about its transparency and potential for political interference, impacting the independence of the judiciary.
- Impact on Victims:The concerns raised by victim and survivor groups highlight the deep-seated mistrust in the system, particularly in relation to transitional justice. They feel that the current process is not ensuring accountability for past human rights violations and is leaving them with a sense of betrayal and humiliation
Calls for Transparency and Inclusivity
Human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the International Commission of Jurists have called on the Nepal government to revise the appointment process to ensure transparency, inclusivity, and impartiality.
They urge the government to:
- Publish a revised schedule and shortlist of candidates
- Meaningfully consult with victims and civil society
- Conduct public hearings with victim and media participation
- Apply clear selection criteria and rigorous background checks
- Use the legal authority to extend the appointment process if necessary
Elaboration:
- Transparency and Inclusivity:Advocates and international organizations are pushing for transparency and inclusivity in the selection of members for transitional justice commissions, aiming to ensure fairness and prevent bias.
- Victim-Centered Approach:The implementation of transitional justice mechanisms should prioritize the needs and perspectives of victims, ensuring they have access to truth, justice, and redress.
- Right to Justice:The constitution of Nepal guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to a fair trial and legal aid, which are crucial for ensuring a just and transparent legal system.
- Freedom of Expression:The right to freedom of expression is also essential for holding the government accountable and ensuring transparency in the justice system.
These recommendations aim to restore trust in the transitional justice process and ensure that the commissions can effectively address the needs and rights of conflict victims.
Political Interference and Its Implications
The involvement of political parties in the appointment process has raised concerns about the independence and impartiality of the TRC and CIEDP. Critics argue that political considerations have overshadowed the need for competent and trustworthy leadership. This politicization threatens to undermine the commissions’ credibility and their ability to deliver justice to victims.(myRepublica)
The delay in appointing new leadership has further exacerbated the situation. The TRC and CIEDP have been without officials since mid-2022, and the prolonged vacancy has hindered progress in addressing the backlog of cases. Victims and their families continue to await justice, and the uncertainty surrounding the appointment process only adds to their frustration and distrust.(myRepublica, Kathmandu Post)
The Role of Civil Society and Victims
Civil society organizations and victims’ groups have been vocal in demanding a transparent and inclusive appointment process. They emphasize the importance of involving victims in the decision-making process to ensure that their voices are heard and their rights are upheld. Without their active participation, the transitional justice process risks being perceived as illegitimate and disconnected from the needs of those it aims to serve.
A petition submitted to the recommendation committee by key stakeholders called for public hearings for shortlisted candidates, virtual access for those unable to attend in person, and live broadcasting of presentations of the candidates through official platforms. The petition emphasized that a transparent process is crucial for restoring trust in the commissions. (Kathmandu Post)
Key Roles of Civil Society:
- Advocacy and Awareness:Civil society organizations raise awareness about the plight of conflict victims and advocate for their rights, both nationally and internationally.
- Monitoring and Oversight:They monitor the implementation of transitional justice mechanisms, ensuring they are fair and inclusive, and hold the government accountable for fulfilling its obligations.
- Empowerment and Support:They provide direct support to victims, including legal assistance, counseling, and psychosocial support, helping them to heal and rebuild their lives.
- Collaboration and Networking:Civil society organizations work collaboratively with each other and with international organizations to amplify their efforts and share resources.
- Peacebuilding and Reconciliation:They promote reconciliation and harmonious coexistence within society, working to heal the wounds of the conflict and prevent future violence.
Challenges:
- Lack of Political Will:Despite legal frameworks, the government’s commitment to transitional justice and the rights of victims can be weak.
- Limited Resources:Civil society organizations often face resource constraints, making it difficult for them to effectively carry out their work.
- Impunity and Lack of Accountability:Many perpetrators of human rights violations during the conflict remain unpunished, leading to a sense of injustice and frustration among victims.
Moving Forward:
- Strengthening Civil Society:Support for civil society organizations is crucial to ensure they can continue to play their vital role in promoting justice for victims.
- Increased Government Commitment:The government must demonstrate a genuine commitment to transitional justice and the rights of victims by allocating resources and ensuring the accountability of perpetrators.
- Victim-Centric Approach:Transitional justice mechanisms must be designed and implemented in a way that is truly victim-centered, prioritizing the needs and voices of those who have suffered.
- International Support:International cooperation and support can help Nepal strengthen its transitional justice process and ensure that victims’ rights are protected.
International Perspectives
The international community has closely monitored Nepal’s transitional justice process, offering support and guidance. Organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have expressed concerns about the current state of affairs and have urged the Nepal government to take immediate action to address the issues at hand.
In a letter to Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, Human Rights Watch highlighted the need for an effective and just outcome to Nepal’s transitional justice process, ensuring victims and survivors have access to justice and reparations for violations and abuses suffered. The letter emphasized that the process must be Nepali-led and that the government has a duty to ensure the integrity of the process. (Human Rights Watch)
Here’s a more detailed look at international perspectives on justice in Nepal:
1. Transitional Justice Mechanisms:
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC):International organizations like the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) have highlighted the importance of a robust and independent TRC, emphasizing the need for victim-centered processes and safeguards against political interference.
- Commission on Investigation of Disappeared Persons (CIEDP):The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) and other organizations have provided technical support to the CIEDP, helping them with the collection and management of ante-mortem data to facilitate investigations.
- Special Court for Reparations:International actors have advocated for the establishment and strengthening of a special court to adjudicate disputes related to reparations, ensuring that victims receive adequate compensation for the harm they suffered.
2. Advocacy and Support:
- Victims’ Rights and Participation:Groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have called for greater participation of victims in all stages of the transitional justice process, ensuring that their voices and perspectives are heard.
- International Standards:The ICJ and other international organizations have emphasized the need for Nepal to adhere to international legal standards in its transitional justice process, including the principles of truth, justice, reparation, and guarantees of non-recurrence.
- Gender Perspective:The ICJ has specifically focused on incorporating a gender perspective into Nepal’s transitional justice mechanisms, advocating for the participation of women in all levels of the TRC and CIEDP, as well as gender-sensitive training for commissioners and staff.
3. Challenges and Concerns:
- Political Interference:International organizations have expressed concerns about political interference in the appointment of commissioners and the overall implementation of transitional justice mechanisms.
- Lack of Accountability:Critics have pointed to the slow pace of investigations and prosecutions for conflict-era crimes, raising concerns about the government’s commitment to accountability.
- Lack of Adequate Reparations:International groups have highlighted the need for more comprehensive and effective reparation programs, including both financial and non-financial remedies for victims.
4. International Organizations Involved:
- The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ):A leading international organization working on justice and human rights issues, with a strong focus on transitional justice in Nepal.
- The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ):Provides technical assistance and expertise in transitional justice processes, including support to the CIEDP.
- Amnesty International:An international human rights organization that has been actively involved in advocating for justice and accountability in Nepal.
- Human Rights Watch:A human rights organization that has documented human rights violations during the conflict and called for greater accountability.
- United Nations:The UN has played a role in supporting Nepal’s transitional justice process through various initiatives, including the appointment of special envoys and the provision of technical assistance.
In essence, international organizations have played a crucial role in pushing for a more comprehensive and just transitional justice process in Nepal, advocating for the rights of victims and holding perpetrators of human rights violations accountable.
The Path Forward
To move forward, it is imperative that the Nepal government takes concrete steps to address the concerns raised by victims, civil society, and the international community. This includes revising the appointment process to ensure transparency, inclusivity, and impartiality. Additionally, there must be a concerted effort to restore public trust in the transitional justice process by demonstrating a genuine commitment to justice and accountability.
Only through a transparent and inclusive process can Nepal hope to achieve meaningful transitional justice that addresses the needs and rights of conflict victims and contributes to long-term peace and reconciliation.
Here’s a more detailed look at the key areas:
1. Political Stability and Good Governance:
- Overcoming Partisanship:Nepal’s political parties need to move beyond narrow agendas and work together for the long-term benefit of the country.
- Strengthening Institutions:Good governance, transparency, and accountability are crucial for building trust and ensuring that institutions function effectively.
- Constitutional Adherence:Strict adherence to constitutional principles is essential for upholding the rule of law and promoting a stable political environment.
2. Economic Development and Sustainability:
- Diversification:Nepal needs to move beyond reliance on foreign aid and develop more diverse and sustainable economic models.
- Infrastructure Development:Investing in roads, electricity, transportation, and industrial estates is essential for boosting competitiveness and attracting investment.
- Sustainable Development:Focusing on long-term development goals, rather than short-term political gains, is crucial for ensuring a prosperous future.
3. Addressing Social Issues and Inclusivity:
- Federalism:The federal system needs to be strengthened by improving coordination between the different levels of government and ensuring that the provinces have the resources and authority they need.
- Equal Access:Ensuring that all citizens have equal access to education, healthcare, and other essential services is crucial for creating a more equitable society.
- Citizen Participation:Involving citizens in decision-making processes and fostering a sense of ownership is essential for building a more democratic and inclusive society.
4. Specific Challenges and Opportunities:
- MCC Freeze:The withdrawal of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) grant highlights the need for Nepal to find alternative sources of funding and to prioritize its development strategy.
- Transitional Justice:Addressing the legacy of the armed conflict and promoting reconciliation through transitional justice is crucial for building a more peaceful and just society.
- Migrant Workers:The high number of Nepali migrant workers who die abroad raises concerns about working conditions and the need for better protection and support for these workers.
In conclusion, the path forward for Nepal requires a multifaceted approach that addresses political, economic, and social challenges while also seizing opportunities for growth and development. By prioritizing policy stability, good governance, and citizen participation, Nepal can chart a course towards a more prosperous and inclusive future.
Related Articles:
- Victims demand transparency in transitional justice official nomination process
- Leadership Appointment Conundrum in TJ bodies
- Nepal’s transitional justice shortlist sparks controversy
For more interesting articles, click here.
